Ancient Literacy and Graffiti


(Larry Hurtado)  One of the big issues in debate in recent scholarship on the ancient Roman world is the extent, nature and uses of literacy.  Everyone agrees, it seems, that a majority of people of that time were illiterate, but the size of that majority remains under dispute.

This has implications for students of the NT and earliest Christianity, of course.  For example, some scholars have contended that texts played less of a role than most have assumed, and that “orality” was dominant.  There is much more involved than can be addressed properly here.  Suffice it to say that I’ve not been terribly impressed with the level of acquaintance with the relevant hard data by some of those downplaying the importance/use of texts and pushing for what I am bound to regard as a somewhat simplistic view of “orality”.

By way of illustration, take the incidence of graffiti.  These aren’t typically data reckoned with in some of these discussions, but probably should be.  For graffiti, by their nature, are likely to reflect “sub-literary” use of writing and reading.  Indeed, in graffiti we probably have our most direct access to a “popular” level of ancient Roman societies.

In a fine collection of studies, I point to an interesting essay by Kristina, Milnor, “Literary Literacy in Roman Pompeii:  The Case of Vergil’s Aeneid,” in Ancient Literacies:  The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, eds. William A. Johnson and Holt N. Parker (New York:  Oxford University Press, 2009), 288-319.  Milnor discusses the incidence of graffiti that make use of phrases from literary texts, often to make jokes.  As she notes, there are thousands of graffiti from Pompeii alone, and of various types, “written in charcoal, scratched with a stick or stylus, painted with a brush,” giving us “a window onto the language of everyday life in the ancient Roman world,” and giving us direct artifacts of “words written by ordinary people performing an activity (writing graffiti) that we in the modern day do not associate with the cultural elite” (291).

Milnor’s essay is a salutary indication that the full body of data to be considered in engaging the “literacy” vs. “orality” debate is more diverse and demanding that some have recognized.


About larryhurtado

I'm a scholar in New Testament and Christian Origins, currently Professor of New Testament Language, Literature & Theology in the University of Edinburgh (since 1996), and previously Professor in the Department of Relgiion, University of Manitoba.

4 responses »

  1. Pingback: Graffiti and Roman Literacy « Larry Hurtado's Blog

  2. Pingback: Larry Hurtado on Literacy, Orality, and Graffiti | Current Events in Light of the Kingdom of God

  3. We are a gaggle of volunteers and opening a new
    scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on.
    You’ve done an impressive activity and our entire community might be grateful to you.

  4. Hi there this is kind of of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs
    use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.
    I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding skills
    so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience.

    Any help would be enormously appreciated!

Leave a Reply to Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s